Review: 300

Normally, I hate stupid films. I like a film that makes me think, and that has puzzles to work out. I hate brainless, style-over-substance, thoroughly ridiculous unrealistic action films. Asian action kung-fu movies are the worst offendors here.

Despite this, I bloody loved 300.

Sure, it isn’t exactly historically acurate (what with Persian monsters and the hideously deformed Immortals), and the Spartan warriors are depicted as invincible super-soldiers, but as I was watching the slow-mo hacking of limbs and ultra-cool combat sequences, I just didn’t care.

300 fighting

This film is extremely stylised, but somehow doesn’t sacrifice too much substance. There is a plot there, albeit a very thin one, but you do empathise with the plight of the Spartan soldiers. The Persian army is well depicted as a vast and terrifying war machine to rival anything out of Lord of the Rings.

Speaking of Lord of the Rings, you can see similarities between the trilogy and this film. The persian foot soldiers are Orcs, the elephants are stylistically oversized to the point of becoming Mumakil, and the monsters are blatantly Trolls.

300 elephant

Neverthelass, 300 does something right that Lord of the Rings did wrong. Let me clear up any confusion here: I loved LOTR. 300, though, has an energy and a cool-factor that LOTR never had. LOTR had epic battles and mighty heroes, but nobody ever got their head split open. You never felt like it was actual people actually killing. In 300, when the Persian army first attacks the Spartan phalanx, you are dragged into the combat. You feel like you’re there. You can believe that a lot of people died messily at Thermoplyae.

300 Leonidas

Because 300 is based on an actual battle. 300 Spartans really did fight a massive army of Persians. Maybe not quite a million as is said in the film, but hundreds of thousands is not unrealistic. The Immortals, too, were an actual Persian elite unit, whose strength was kept at 10,000 (when one died another was drafted in to replace them, hence the unit was ‘immortal’). They weren’t the half-human masked men depicted in the movie, but they existed. Oh, and they weren’t clones of the Stormtroopers from Star Wars.

300 Comparison

Also, and I find this fact rather impressive, the wall of Persian dead became so high that attacking waves of Persians had to climd over a mountain of their own comrades to attack the elite Spartans. True enough, a wall of Persian dead makes an appearence in the movie.

300 Persian dead

To sum up, 300 is an incredible achievement. I would describe it with words like “spectacular” and “awesome” and kick-ass”, but not “clever” or “thought-provoking”. With 300, it’s the experience that counts, and it’s one hell of an experience.


Trackbacks & Pingbacks


  1. i like your way to edit website .
    open this website it is website just diffrent as your website.

    | Reply Posted 2 years, 5 months ago
  2. * Lettice says:

    Bruno / Geralmente, quando julgamos o aspecto da aparência para desaceitar tal pessoa, isso se chama Ad hominem, contudo, a imagem também pode nos dizer muito a respeito da seriedade da pessoa, por isso é bom fica sempre com o pé ato¡sÃ.Grstei deste comentário ou não: 1

    | Reply Posted 6 months, 4 weeks ago
  3. Sier som Guri:) Men hva med å få litt farger innendørs, i stua. Alt trenger ikke være hvitt og latte? Hvitt og latte gjør vinteren trist, noen koselige farger på vegger, puter og møbler, er et fint triks i mørketiden.:)

    | Reply Posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: